Back to perspectives

Trade and Working Capital

Hong Kong exports rise 64.9%: how much cash does a HK$10 million order need?

A warehouse watercolour with ledgers and electronic parts on a desk, shelves of cartons and a container truck leaving the doorway

A surge in export value does not mean every business has won more orders. For a family business that has, the quotation needs a cash calculation: how much must be paid for purchasing, production and shipping before the customer pays?

01

Find where the growth is happening

On 28 October, the Census and Statistics Department reported that Hong Kong’s total merchandise export value reached HK$762.6 billion in September 2026, up 64.9% from a year earlier. The accompanying tables show export value rising 66.2% for electrical machinery, apparatus, appliances and related parts, and 183.7% for office machines and automatic data processing machines. These categories help explain the aggregate increase; they do not establish that orders or profits rose at the same rate across industries or individual firms.[1][2]

The figures are measured at current prices and do not remove price changes. Volume and price statistics are published separately, with the September release scheduled for 12 November. The 64.9% figure therefore cannot be read as a 64.9% rise in physical export volume, and by itself does not establish that demand growth will persist.[1][3]

02

A HK$10 million order can require HK$6.5 million upfront

Consider a purely hypothetical order, with every amount in Hong Kong dollars. This is neither a client case nor a market quotation. A business wins a HK$10 million order. Its customer pays a 20% deposit, or HK$2 million, on day 0 and the HK$8 million balance on day 90. Purchasing and production cost HK$8 million: the business pays its supplier 30%, or HK$2.4 million, on day 0, then HK$5.6 million before shipment on day 30. Freight and other direct cash costs of HK$0.5 million are paid on day 35.

On day 0, HK$2 million comes in and HK$2.4 million goes out, requiring HK$0.4 million from the business. By day 30, cumulative spending reaches HK$8 million; after the customer deposit, the funding requirement is HK$6 million. The day-35 payment takes it to HK$6.5 million, tied up until day 90 if the customer pays on time. After all receipts, revenue less those direct cash outlays is HK$1.5 million. Financing costs, fixed operating expenses and taxes are still excluded, so this is not net profit.

03

The next order can use up the first order’s funding headroom

Suppose a second order on identical terms starts on day 45. Its supplier balance falls due on day 75 and its other direct costs on day 80, before the first customer has paid the balance. The combined peak funding requirement reaches HK$13 million on day 80. Cash needed for additional orders depends on the timing and overlap of payments. An individual order’s margin does not answer that question, and the full bank balance is not necessarily available for working capital.

If the first customer pays 30 days late, that order’s HK$6.5 million stays tied up for another 30 days. Viewed alone, its peak need not increase, but its overlap with later purchases lasts longer. The assessment therefore includes actual customer payment history, acceptance or documentary conditions, and cash outlays on existing orders during the same period. This is G70’s analysis of a hypothetical scenario, not a departmental estimate of business financing needs.

04

Negotiate the cash terms alongside the margin

In the single-order model, raising the customer deposit from 20% to 30%, with all other costs and payment dates unchanged, reduces peak funding from HK$6.5 million to HK$5.5 million. Moving only the final payment from day 90 to day 60 leaves receipt after the day-35 funding peak: the HK$6.5 million peak is unchanged, while the funding period is shorter. One change reduces the amount; the other reduces the time. Supplier credit, staged deliveries and receipt arrangements belong on the same timeline, with any change in price or counterparty acceptance included in the comparison.

G70’s view is that export growth points to business activity, while an individual firm’s contracts and funds determine its capacity to take an order. A usable order budget shows cumulative receipts and payments by date, the highest shortfall, and cash available after existing obligations such as payroll. If borrowing is needed, only a confirmed drawable facility, its drawdown conditions and total cost can be included as a funding source. A credit application still under review is not cash already received.

Sources